Triple
T25884174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dumitrescu |
E652133
|
entity |
| Predicate | commonInEthnicGroup |
P172327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Romanians |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romanians | Statement: [Dumitrescu, commonInEthnicGroup, Romanians]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonInEthnicGroup Context triple: [Dumitrescu, commonInEthnicGroup, Romanians]
-
A.
relatedEthnicGroup
Indicates that there is a notable ethnic connection or association between two ethnic groups, such as shared ancestry, culture, or historical ties.
-
B.
mayBelongToEthnicGroup
Indicates that an entity is possibly, but not certainly, a member of a specified ethnic group.
-
C.
nearEthnicGroup
Indicates that one entity is located geographically close to an ethnic group.
-
D.
sharesBorderWithEthnicGroup
Indicates that a geographic or political entity has a land or maritime boundary directly adjacent to the territory predominantly inhabited by a specified ethnic group.
-
E.
otherEthnicGroup
Indicates that one entity belongs to a different ethnic group than the other entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3b92cc81908febd90317862647 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa1c555081908787dbf76147f180 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6aaf31a548190b2f792ff4b8c002a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:17 a.m.