Triple
T25861052
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | الطريقة القادرية |
E651477
|
entity |
| Predicate | تُعد من |
P1120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | أوسع الطرق الصوفية انتشارًا |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: أوسع الطرق الصوفية انتشارًا | Statement: [الطريقة القادرية, تُعد من, أوسع الطرق الصوفية انتشارًا]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: تُعد من Context triple: [الطريقة القادرية, تُعد من, أوسع الطرق الصوفية انتشارًا]
-
A.
considered
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
B.
consideredPartOf
Indicates that one entity is regarded or treated as a component, segment, or subset of another entity within a larger whole.
-
C.
considersItself
Indicates that an entity regards or perceives itself in a particular way, role, or state.
-
D.
tends
Indicates that one entity regularly or characteristically behaves in a certain way or moves toward a particular state or outcome in relation to another.
-
E.
isSuitableFor
Indicates that one entity is appropriate, fitting, or well-matched for use, application, or association with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3a199c81909227cb964cacfe24 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6026b467c8190a1f8be336f8679da |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4a0fed15881909b789251fe5d8d45 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:05 a.m.