Triple
T25857711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Second Lateran Council |
E651393
|
entity |
| Predicate | approvedDoctrineOn |
P14528
|
FINISHED |
| Object | authority of the Roman pontiff |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authority of the Roman pontiff | Statement: [Second Lateran Council, approvedDoctrineOn, authority of the Roman pontiff]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approvedDoctrineOn Context triple: [Second Lateran Council, approvedDoctrineOn, authority of the Roman pontiff]
-
A.
confirmedDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
B.
acceptsDoctrine
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, adopts, or agrees to follow the doctrine put forward by another entity.
-
C.
proposesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
-
D.
approvedAs
Indicates that one entity has been officially accepted, authorized, or validated in a particular role, status, or capacity by another entity.
-
E.
deniesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab39035c8190be15c8aaee1bb858 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca204148190850a3dc325bc07b7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:01 a.m.