Triple
T2584689
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alfonso Lopez Jr. |
E57170
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt |
P12285
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction
"Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
|
E279521
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction | Statement: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt, Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction Context triple: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt, Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction]
-
A.
United States v. Booker
United States v. Booker is a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision that rendered the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory to preserve their constitutionality under the Sixth Amendment.
-
B.
ACT Supreme Court
The ACT Supreme Court is the highest court in the Australian Capital Territory, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from lower courts in the territory.
-
C.
supreme administrative court
A supreme administrative court is the highest judicial body in a country responsible for resolving disputes involving public administration and reviewing the legality of government actions and administrative decisions.
-
D.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
E.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Puerto Rico, serving as the final arbiter of legal disputes and interpreter of the territory’s constitution and laws.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction Triple: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt, Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction]
Generated description
"Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction Target entity description: "Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
-
A.
United States v. Booker
United States v. Booker is a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision that rendered the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory to preserve their constitutionality under the Sixth Amendment.
-
B.
ACT Supreme Court
The ACT Supreme Court is the highest court in the Australian Capital Territory, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from lower courts in the territory.
-
C.
supreme administrative court
A supreme administrative court is the highest judicial body in a country responsible for resolving disputes involving public administration and reviewing the legality of government actions and administrative decisions.
-
D.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
E.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Puerto Rico, serving as the final arbiter of legal disputes and interpreter of the territory’s constitution and laws.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt Context triple: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., legalStatusAfterSupremeCourt, Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction]
-
A.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
B.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
C.
SupremeCourtEffect
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or condition has an effect that is determined by, derived from, or constrained by the rulings or authority of a supreme court.
-
D.
succeededInSupremeCourtSeatBy
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in occupying the same seat on the Supreme Court.
-
E.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4dca6481908c301f8e317396e7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd3cd07588190b3cb8cc348f12938 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69af6581f6fc819099ea28ecbb0093d7 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 12:27 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69af67bbd6048190aaa091e6ce8cdd23 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 12:37 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69af6839cd1c81909ef772cda4bd2f9c |
completed | March 10, 2026, 12:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0d19308819089ee942513d567a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.