Triple
T25842921
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FPDA |
E650984
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multilateral security arrangement |
C22718
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: multilateral security arrangement Context triple: [FPDA, instanceOf, multilateral security arrangement]
-
A.
trilateral security partners
Trilateral security partners are three sovereign entities that formally coordinate defense, intelligence, and strategic policies to enhance their collective security and regional or global stability.
-
B.
collective defense agreement
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
C.
multinational military forum
A multinational military forum is an organized platform where representatives from multiple countries' armed forces convene to discuss security issues, coordinate policies, share best practices, and enhance mutual understanding and cooperation.
-
D.
bilateral military agreement
A bilateral military agreement is a formal pact between two states that outlines mutual defense commitments, security cooperation, and related military obligations and activities.
-
E.
political-military alliance
chosen
A political-military alliance is a formal agreement between two or more states to coordinate their defense and foreign policies, often including mutual security guarantees and joint military planning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab38086081908f3a8e7e0c6efd83 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:50 a.m.