Triple
T25823036
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union |
E650450
|
entity |
| Predicate | ECLI |
P49399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ECLI:EU:C:2018:999 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ECLI:EU:C:2018:999 | Statement: [C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, ECLI, ECLI:EU:C:2018:999]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ECLI Context triple: [C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, ECLI, ECLI:EU:C:2018:999]
-
A.
legalCitationSystem
chosen
Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
-
B.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
C.
jurisdictionOfTribunal
Indicates the legal authority or scope within which a particular tribunal is empowered to hear and decide cases.
-
D.
courtCode
Indicates the specific court or judicial body associated with a legal case, proceeding, or record.
-
E.
ECHRJudgmentRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a substantive connection or relevance between a given element (such as a case, document, or legal issue) and a specific judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab367fcc8190a5ff1e7f3da046a4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60192afc881908dd64d8024d75329 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:30 a.m.