Triple
T25816606
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | الحارث بن عبد المطلب |
E650271
|
entity |
| Predicate | النسب إلى |
P74793
|
FINISHED |
| Object | بني هاشم بن عبد مناف |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: بني هاشم بن عبد مناف | Statement: [الحارث بن عبد المطلب, النسب إلى, بني هاشم بن عبد مناف]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: النسب إلى Context triple: [الحارث بن عبد المطلب, النسب إلى, بني هاشم بن عبد مناف]
-
A.
النسب
chosen
Indicates a genealogical or familial relationship linking one entity to another through lineage or descent.
-
B.
نسب
Indicates a kinship or lineage relationship linking one entity to another through family or ancestral ties.
-
C.
proportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so changes in one are directly reflected by proportional changes in the other.
-
D.
alternativeRatio
Indicates the proportion or comparative share between different alternative options within a given context.
-
E.
representationRatio
Indicates the proportional relationship between how much one entity represents, depicts, or stands in for another relative to some whole or reference amount.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab367fcc8190a5ff1e7f3da046a4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f600ca169c8190b8f75d1d1e66396a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:26 a.m.