Triple
T25814969
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | administrative courts of Egypt |
E650222
|
entity |
| Predicate | hearCasesAgainst |
P18526
|
FINISHED |
| Object | local government bodies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local government bodies | Statement: [administrative courts of Egypt, hearCasesAgainst, local government bodies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearCasesAgainst Context triple: [administrative courts of Egypt, hearCasesAgainst, local government bodies]
-
A.
hearsCasesAgainst
chosen
Indicates that one party (typically a judicial body or official) formally listens to and considers legal cases brought against another party.
-
B.
hearCasesBroughtBy
Indicates that a judicial body or authority formally considers and adjudicates legal cases initiated by a particular party or group.
-
C.
hearsCasesAs
Indicates that one judicial body or judge reviews and adjudicates cases originating from another court or jurisdiction.
-
D.
hearsAppealsAgainst
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers appeals challenging the decisions or actions of another entity.
-
E.
hearsCasesWith
Indicates that one judicial body or judge conducts proceedings together with another judicial body or judge in hearing the same cases.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab367fcc8190a5ff1e7f3da046a4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f603bb02288190b40cedbed5b9651d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d07590819085ac34b189613104 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:25 a.m.