Triple
T25814941
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | administrative courts of Egypt |
E650222
|
entity |
| Predicate | adjudicate |
P19254
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legality of administrative acts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legality of administrative acts | Statement: [administrative courts of Egypt, adjudicate, legality of administrative acts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: adjudicate Context triple: [administrative courts of Egypt, adjudicate, legality of administrative acts]
-
A.
canAdjudicate
chosen
Indicates that an entity has the authority or capacity to formally judge, decide, or resolve a dispute, case, or issue involving another entity or matter.
-
B.
judge
Indicates that one entity evaluates, forms an opinion about, or makes a decision regarding another entity or situation.
-
C.
decides
Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
-
D.
verdict
Indicates the formal decision or judgment reached and declared at the conclusion of a legal or evaluative process.
-
E.
affirms
Indicates that one entity explicitly confirms, supports, or asserts the truth or validity of another entity, statement, or proposition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab367fcc8190a5ff1e7f3da046a4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f600c84ac4819091492e52a5a8b873 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:25 a.m.