Triple
T25814643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ahl al-Bayt |
E650214
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConceptualDispute |
P35424
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scope of who is included |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scope of who is included | Statement: [Ahl al-Bayt, hasConceptualDispute, scope of who is included]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConceptualDispute Context triple: [Ahl al-Bayt, hasConceptualDispute, scope of who is included]
-
A.
hasConceptualIssue
Indicates that one entity has a problem, flaw, or inconsistency in its underlying idea, theory, or conceptual basis in relation to another entity.
-
B.
disputed
Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
-
C.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
D.
hasDisputedCircumscription
chosen
Indicates that there is disagreement or uncertainty about how the boundaries or scope of something are formally defined or delimited.
-
E.
debatedBetween
Indicates a situation in which two or more parties engage in a discussion or argument over differing views about a particular issue or topic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab367fcc8190a5ff1e7f3da046a4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcd867f36081908c88c55a6a1404c1 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd1f47b188190b4cf4b4c748d9d03 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:25 a.m.