Triple

T25804123
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proto-Samic E649915 entity
Predicate hasMorphologyDescribedIn P168901 FINISHED
Object Proto-Samic morphology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proto-Samic morphology | Statement: [Proto-Samic, hasMorphologyDescribedIn, Proto-Samic morphology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMorphologyDescribedIn
Context triple: [Proto-Samic, hasMorphologyDescribedIn, Proto-Samic morphology]
  • A. hasMorphologyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that the morphology (form or structure) of one entity is different from that of another entity.
  • B. hasMorphosyntacticBasis
    Indicates that one linguistic element’s form or syntactic behavior is grounded in, derived from, or systematically determined by another element’s morphosyntactic properties.
  • C. notableMorphology
    Indicates that an entity is characterized by a distinctive or noteworthy physical form, structure, or shape.
  • D. morphologicalEvidence
    Indicates that there is supporting evidence based on the form, structure, or morphology of the entities involved.
  • E. hasPhonologicalDescription
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific representation or description of its sound structure or phonological form.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab35d264819095367f7e80c983ff completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67866e9248190b7ba218f9ca2ae8d completed May 2, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f675fd59608190b246383435e68fce completed May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f676c35f3481909b9ba18a5662d6ce completed May 2, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:01 a.m.