Triple
T25785324
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wright v. United States |
E649402
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | case interpreting the Presentment Clause |
C50982
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: case interpreting the Presentment Clause Context triple: [Wright v. United States, instanceOf, case interpreting the Presentment Clause]
-
A.
Origination Clause case
An Origination Clause case is a legal dispute that examines whether a federal tax or revenue-raising measure unconstitutionally originated in the Senate rather than the House of Representatives, as required by Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution.
-
B.
Supreme Court footnote
A Supreme Court footnote is a subordinate textual annotation in a Court opinion that provides clarification, limitation, or additional reasoning that can significantly influence the interpretation and scope of the decision.
-
C.
Insular Cases decision
An Insular Cases decision is a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from the early 20th century that determined how the Constitution applies to territories acquired by the United States, distinguishing between "incorporated" and "unincorporated" territories.
-
D.
United States Supreme Court brief
A United States Supreme Court brief is a formal written legal document submitted to the Court that presents a party’s arguments, relevant facts, and supporting authorities to persuade the Justices to rule in that party’s favor.
-
E.
judicial holding
A judicial holding is the court’s essential legal determination on the specific issues necessary to resolve a case, which forms binding precedent for future similar disputes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:54 a.m.