Triple
T25784808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baze v. Rees |
E649389
|
entity |
| Predicate | methodOfExecutionChallenged |
P160940
|
FINISHED |
| Object | three-drug lethal injection protocol |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: three-drug lethal injection protocol | Statement: [Baze v. Rees, methodOfExecutionChallenged, three-drug lethal injection protocol]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: methodOfExecutionChallenged Context triple: [Baze v. Rees, methodOfExecutionChallenged, three-drug lethal injection protocol]
-
A.
mayBeChallengedBy
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
-
B.
branchChallenged
Indicates that one branch or offshoot has been questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party or authority.
-
C.
measureChallenged
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or appropriateness of a measurement has been questioned or formally disputed.
-
D.
hasBeenChallengedFor
Indicates that an entity has been formally questioned, disputed, or contested specifically in relation to another entity or issue.
-
E.
stateActionChallenged
Indicates that an action taken by a state (or state authority) has been formally disputed, questioned, or contested by another party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60cd7b3e88190a1206958c0f0b225 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b8461ac81908c5bd3d73eed59f4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f60c32ce088190a620eb59d2499fa9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:53 a.m.