Triple
T25784529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blakely v. Washington |
E649383
|
entity |
| Predicate | affectedLaw |
P70595
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Washington State Sentencing Reform Act |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Washington State Sentencing Reform Act | Statement: [Blakely v. Washington, affectedLaw, Washington State Sentencing Reform Act]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affectedLaw Context triple: [Blakely v. Washington, affectedLaw, Washington State Sentencing Reform Act]
-
A.
affectsStatute
chosen
Indicates that one legal action, decision, or document has a modifying, influencing, or changing impact on a particular statute.
-
B.
impactOnLaw
Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
-
C.
affectedJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity’s authority, control, or legal power extends over and impacts the jurisdiction of another entity.
-
D.
affectedAdministrationOfJustice
Indicates that an action or behavior has negatively influenced, obstructed, or compromised the proper functioning or fairness of the justice system.
-
E.
fallsUnderLaw
Indicates that one entity is subject to, governed by, or regulated under a particular law or legal provision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6430a93a48190854ce71df680b2fa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641da05b881909f6283c988639c53 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:53 a.m.