Triple
T2578119
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bancor |
E57023
|
entity |
| Predicate | influencedLaterDebatesOn |
P9239
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reform of the international monetary system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reform of the international monetary system | Statement: [Bancor, influencedLaterDebatesOn, reform of the international monetary system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influencedLaterDebatesOn Context triple: [Bancor, influencedLaterDebatesOn, reform of the international monetary system]
-
A.
influencedDiscussionOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity had an effect on the way another entity was discussed, framed, or debated.
-
B.
hasLongTermDebateOn
Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
-
C.
hasDebate
Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
-
D.
notableDebateMoment
Indicates a particularly significant or memorable moment that occurred during a debate, often cited or recalled as especially impactful.
-
E.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4dca6481908c301f8e317396e7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd3a86f9881908df29a7caaf9a7df |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0cfeae08190aed03866ba071c5c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.