Triple
T25779703
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bosnian Croat leadership |
E649252
|
entity |
| Predicate | ICTYCaseName |
P159254
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Prlić et al. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prlić et al. | Statement: [Bosnian Croat leadership, ICTYCaseName, Prlić et al.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ICTYCaseName Context triple: [Bosnian Croat leadership, ICTYCaseName, Prlić et al.]
-
A.
ICTYOutcome
Indicates the judicial result or final decision rendered by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in a given case or for a specific individual.
-
B.
ICJCaseName
Indicates that a particular legal case is identified by a specific official name as recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
-
C.
ICJCaseSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the subject (i.e., the party or matter under consideration) in a case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
-
D.
ICJDecision
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling has been issued by the International Court of Justice concerning a dispute or legal question between parties.
-
E.
tribunalNumber
Indicates the identifying number assigned to a specific tribunal within a legal or administrative system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab333b508190b6d708d8d9a328ed |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fe5f81388190a7352c5782b19d80 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f497b8abb88190bb672cf6907c4b8d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:37 a.m.