Triple
T25774301
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Who Dey cheer |
E649102
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullChantText |
P15355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Who dey, who dey, who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals? |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Who dey, who dey, who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals? | Statement: [Who Dey cheer, fullChantText, Who dey, who dey, who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals?]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fullChantText Context triple: [Who Dey cheer, fullChantText, Who dey, who dey, who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals?]
-
A.
chantingIs24x7
Indicates that the chanting activity occurs continuously, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
-
B.
languageOfChant
Indicates the language in which a chant is performed or expressed.
-
C.
hasChant
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular chant.
-
D.
chantingMedium
Indicates that the action or communication is performed through chanting as the medium or method.
-
E.
relatedChantOrSong
Indicates that one chant or song is associated with, derived from, or otherwise connected to another chant or song.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab333b508190b6d708d8d9a328ed |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fe5be4a8819083e43efecd8423a0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:33 a.m.