Triple
T25772847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Sydney Rabbitohs |
E649067
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalColorsPattern |
P31069
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red and green hoops |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red and green hoops | Statement: [South Sydney Rabbitohs, traditionalColorsPattern, red and green hoops]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalColorsPattern Context triple: [South Sydney Rabbitohs, traditionalColorsPattern, red and green hoops]
-
A.
traditionalKitColor
Indicates the customary or historically established color scheme used for an entity’s standard or primary kit or uniform.
-
B.
hasTraditionalColors
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with colors that are traditionally or customarily linked to it.
-
C.
originalColors
Indicates that something retains or is associated with its initial, unaltered set of colors.
-
D.
colors
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
E.
traditionalMotif
Indicates that something incorporates, represents, or is characterized by a motif rooted in established cultural or historical traditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab333b508190b6d708d8d9a328ed |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:31 a.m.