Triple

T25768224
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CIA KUBARK interrogation manual E648940 entity
Predicate legalStatusDiscussedAs P46067 FINISHED
Object potentially violating international law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: potentially violating international law | Statement: [CIA KUBARK interrogation manual, legalStatusDiscussedAs, potentially violating international law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusDiscussedAs
Context triple: [CIA KUBARK interrogation manual, legalStatusDiscussedAs, potentially violating international law]
  • A. legalStatusDebatedBy chosen
    Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the subject of dispute, discussion, or controversy among parties or authorities.
  • B. legalStatusClarifiedBy
    Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
  • C. legalStatusAtIssue
    Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
  • D. legalStatusNote
    Indicates a note or comment that provides additional information or clarification about the legal status of something.
  • E. legalStatusBefore
    Indicates the legal condition or classification that applied to an entity prior to a specified event, change, or point in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab322db0819092d6a2b3d4572e01 completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b903538481909cffcb6cc1cc0e70 completed May 3, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b626120c819097c9ad04487570d7 completed May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:12 a.m.