Triple

T2575308
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Law 96-510 E57760 entity
Predicate createsCategory P39888 FINISHED
Object potentially responsible party LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: potentially responsible party | Statement: [Public Law 96-510, createsCategory, potentially responsible party]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: createsCategory
Context triple: [Public Law 96-510, createsCategory, potentially responsible party]
  • A. settingCategory
    Indicates the classification or type of context in which something is set or configured (e.g., grouping settings under a common category).
  • B. category
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a member or type within the grouping or class defined by another entity.
  • C. canonicalCategory
    Indicates that an entity is assigned to its primary or standard category within a classification system.
  • D. uniformCategory
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same classification or type within a defined category system.
  • E. commonsCategory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific media or topic category on Wikimedia Commons.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a51410081908501dcf8bad9adc4 completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd3a43f188190a3d7538bf7867466 completed March 7, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0ce4dcc8190b17a65abf9bd1bb0 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd251b48c8190862c7b39ea1bf8ea completed March 7, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:48 p.m.