Triple
T25741722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intel 7 |
E648234
|
entity |
| Predicate | nodeRenamingStrategy |
P30638
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aligned with foundry industry naming |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aligned with foundry industry naming | Statement: [Intel 7, nodeRenamingStrategy, aligned with foundry industry naming]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nodeRenamingStrategy Context triple: [Intel 7, nodeRenamingStrategy, aligned with foundry industry naming]
-
A.
contextOfRenaming
chosen
Indicates the situational or historical context in which an entity’s name was or is being changed.
-
B.
renamingAuthority
Indicates that the subject has the authority or power to change the name or designation of the object.
-
C.
renamingSupportedBy
Indicates that one entity provides the capability or functionality to perform renaming operations on another entity.
-
D.
relocatedAndRenamed
Indicates that an entity has moved from one location to another and changed its name as part of that move.
-
E.
changesNameTo
Indicates that an entity alters its current name and adopts a new specified name.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab306eec8190b05c312c6ab186b8 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fd1b3010819098da2e7d46dfc326 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938262ac8190b41f922d0407d272 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 3:45 a.m.