Triple
T25722663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taba Summit 2001 |
E645032
|
entity |
| Predicate | discussedIssue |
P51889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | security arrangements |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: security arrangements | Statement: [Taba Summit 2001, discussedIssue, security arrangements]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: discussedIssue Context triple: [Taba Summit 2001, discussedIssue, security arrangements]
-
A.
discussed
chosen
Indicates that one entity talked about, examined, or debated a topic, issue, or other entity with someone else.
-
B.
involvesIssue
Indicates that an action, event, or entity is related to, concerns, or includes a particular issue.
-
C.
discussedAs
Indicates that one entity is talked about, treated, or examined in terms of another entity, often as an example, case, or framing concept.
-
D.
issue
Indicates that an entity formally publishes, releases, or distributes something, such as a document, statement, or item, often in an official or authoritative capacity.
-
E.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8476fc8190bd5e9d05b89fad0a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6135293908190809e255bf6334760 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611a72780819082f44e66ca2c6ac9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 10:04 p.m.