Triple
T25722402
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beitar Illit |
E645026
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusAccordingToUN |
P1049
|
FINISHED |
| Object | considered illegal under international law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: considered illegal under international law | Statement: [Beitar Illit, legalStatusAccordingToUN, considered illegal under international law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAccordingToUN Context triple: [Beitar Illit, legalStatusAccordingToUN, considered illegal under international law]
-
A.
legalStatusRecognizedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status is officially acknowledged or valid within a specified jurisdiction or legal system.
-
B.
legalStatusInMostCountries
Indicates the typical legal classification or treatment of something across the majority of countries.
-
C.
hasUNStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds a particular formal status or recognition within the United Nations system.
-
D.
legalStatusOfTerritoryAdministered
Indicates the legal status or standing of a territory that is under a particular administration or governing authority.
-
E.
legalStatusClaimedByUS
Indicates that the United States has asserted or claimed a particular legal status for the referenced entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8476fc8190bd5e9d05b89fad0a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a28c7c148190bfc980aad9f678ca |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69fe1e3c88190830bb2e9f407357e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 10:04 p.m.