Triple
T25716341
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Council of State (France) |
E644872
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableCaseLaw |
P178187
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arrêt Blanco (1873) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arrêt Blanco (1873) | Statement: [Council of State (France), hasNotableCaseLaw, Arrêt Blanco (1873)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableCaseLaw Context triple: [Council of State (France), hasNotableCaseLaw, Arrêt Blanco (1873)]
-
A.
hasJurisprudence
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses, is associated with, or is governed by a particular body of legal principles, case law, or judicial doctrine.
-
B.
hasCourtPractice
Indicates that an entity engages in or is associated with a particular court-related legal practice or activity.
-
C.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
D.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
E.
hasOngoingLegalSignificance
Indicates that a legal matter, status, or decision continues to have current relevance, effect, or consequences under the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8476fc8190bd5e9d05b89fad0a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7817daf00819098936402e75ab0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780fc5ed88190b7200ee5a29940af |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 9:43 p.m.