Triple

T25711103
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of the Yser E644730 entity
Predicate defensiveLineCreated P164178 FINISHED
Object Yser Front NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yser Front | Statement: [Battle of the Yser, defensiveLineCreated, Yser Front]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensiveLineCreated
Context triple: [Battle of the Yser, defensiveLineCreated, Yser Front]
  • A. defensiveLineAlong
    Indicates a spatial relationship where a defensive formation or barrier is arranged along the length or path of a specified line or boundary.
  • B. usedDefensiveLine
    Indicates that an entity employed or deployed a particular defensive line as part of its strategy or actions.
  • C. defensiveLineCharacteristic
    Indicates a characteristic or attribute that describes the nature, style, or qualities of a defensive line in a competitive or strategic context.
  • D. defensiveLineTargeted
    Indicates that a specific defensive line or its players are the intended focus of an offensive play, strategy, or action.
  • E. primaryDefensiveLine
    Indicates the main line of defense that first engages or protects against an opposing force or threat.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e77e83c8ec8190bf52fcdac4838984 completed April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f643c204508190a43fe0ec5165b01c completed May 2, 2026, 6:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641da05b881909f6283c988639c53 completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6430975b481909191219ad13ef77e completed May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 9:14 p.m.