Triple
T25708961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eamont Bridge |
E644675
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeCountyPre1974 |
P26580
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Westmorland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Westmorland | Statement: [Eamont Bridge, administrativeCountyPre1974, Westmorland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativeCountyPre1974 Context triple: [Eamont Bridge, administrativeCountyPre1974, Westmorland]
-
A.
formerAdministrativeCountyIncludes
chosen
Indicates that a geographic area was once part of, or contained within, the boundaries of a former administrative county.
-
B.
hasModernAdministrativeCounty
Indicates that an entity is located within or associated with a specific modern administrative county as defined by current governmental boundaries.
-
C.
historicalCounty
Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
-
D.
locatedInMetropolitanCountyAfter1974
Indicates that an entity is situated within a metropolitan county as defined in or after the 1974 local government reorganization.
-
E.
historicCountyPredecessor
Indicates that one historic county served as a predecessor or earlier form of another historic county in an administrative or territorial succession.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e83c8ec8190bf52fcdac4838984 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f670b608190a0b6ab60d722b4e0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b78f29481908cc8f390496dee97 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 9:08 p.m.