Triple
T25663299
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wansbeck (UK Parliament constituency) |
E643443
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyCentredOn |
P145012
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ashington |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashington | Statement: [Wansbeck (UK Parliament constituency), historicallyCentredOn, Ashington]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyCentredOn Context triple: [Wansbeck (UK Parliament constituency), historicallyCentredOn, Ashington]
-
A.
historicalCenterFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity has served as a central or focal place of historical significance, activity, or development for another entity.
-
B.
historicallyBasedOn
Indicates that something is derived from, inspired by, or modeled on historical events, sources, or precedents.
-
C.
historicallyCircumscribedBy
Indicates that one entity’s historical existence, development, or significance is bounded, defined, or delimited by the historical context or period associated with another entity.
-
D.
historicallyIn
Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
-
E.
historicallyEncompassed
Indicates that one entity previously included, covered, or contained another entity within its scope, extent, or boundaries during a past historical period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7e45648190a068ed3faa8016ea |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d26ceb08819091c71c001e954936 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 6:58 p.m.