Triple
T25659471
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shia Imams |
E643336
|
entity |
| Predicate | areAssociatedWithDoctrine |
P135565
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ismah (infallibility) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ismah (infallibility) | Statement: [Shia Imams, areAssociatedWithDoctrine, Ismah (infallibility)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areAssociatedWithDoctrine Context triple: [Shia Imams, areAssociatedWithDoctrine, Ismah (infallibility)]
-
A.
usesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or relies on a particular doctrine in its actions or reasoning.
-
B.
containsDoctrine
Indicates that one entity includes, embodies, or incorporates the doctrine, principles, or teachings represented by another entity.
-
C.
contributesToDoctrine
Indicates that one entity plays a role in forming, shaping, or supporting the doctrinal position or belief system of another entity.
-
D.
acceptsDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, adopts, or agrees to follow the doctrine put forward by another entity.
-
E.
sharesDoctrine
Indicates that two entities adhere to or promote the same doctrine, belief system, or set of principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7e45648190a068ed3faa8016ea |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5faee68408190b602dc71ec5b83aa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4a0f7c6008190ae8cee3e71e19b94 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 6:50 p.m.