Triple

T25654991
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baksho Rahashya E643207 entity
Predicate hasCompanionOfDetective P180885 FINISHED
Object Topshe NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Topshe | Statement: [Baksho Rahashya, hasCompanionOfDetective, Topshe]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCompanionOfDetective
Context triple: [Baksho Rahashya, hasCompanionOfDetective, Topshe]
  • A. companionOfDetective chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the detective’s close associate or partner, typically accompanying and assisting them in their investigative work.
  • B. hasFictionalDetective
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or series) features or includes a fictional detective character as part of its content.
  • C. hasClericalDetective
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a detective who is also a member of the clergy.
  • D. featuresDetectiveDuo
    Indicates that the subject involves or centers around a pair of detectives working together as a team.
  • E. detectiveType
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a particular type or category of detective in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e77e7d8a848190a98d0162325fd780 completed April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb6fdc7eb081908ab8475efb38c430 completed May 6, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb5a986e588190b7a10892bd2ff44c completed May 6, 2026, 3:13 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 6:32 p.m.