Triple
T25642141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stack Overflow |
E642862
|
entity |
| Predicate | reputationUsedFor |
P159475
|
FINISHED |
| Object | privilege levels |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: privilege levels | Statement: [Stack Overflow, reputationUsedFor, privilege levels]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reputationUsedFor Context triple: [Stack Overflow, reputationUsedFor, privilege levels]
-
A.
reputationBuiltFor
Indicates that one entity has established or developed a reputation specifically for or in relation to another entity.
-
B.
haveReputation
Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded in a certain way by others, reflecting its perceived character, quality, or status.
-
C.
denotesReputationOf
Indicates that one entity represents, expresses, or serves as an indicator of the reputation or perceived standing of another entity.
-
D.
associatedWithReputation
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
-
E.
hasReputationAmong
Indicates that an entity is regarded or perceived in a particular way by a specified group or audience.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7ce28081908b08d65ee6e5c8be |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5faa11fa88190a7bb53c814995268 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4a0f7c6008190ae8cee3e71e19b94 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f55e497fa081909bc59a7b92c5df59 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:45 p.m.