Triple
T25640918
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indian Child Welfare Act |
E642832
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBeenChallengedInCase |
P40041
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Haaland v. Brackeen |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Haaland v. Brackeen | Statement: [Indian Child Welfare Act, hasBeenChallengedInCase, Haaland v. Brackeen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBeenChallengedInCase Context triple: [Indian Child Welfare Act, hasBeenChallengedInCase, Haaland v. Brackeen]
-
A.
hasBeenChallengedIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity has faced a challenge, contest, or dispute within a specified context, domain, or setting.
-
B.
hasBeenChallengedFor
Indicates that an entity has been formally questioned, disputed, or contested specifically in relation to another entity or issue.
-
C.
canBeChallengedOn
Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
-
D.
stateChallenged
Indicates that a state or condition is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party.
-
E.
laterChallengedBy
Indicates that an earlier claim, decision, or position was subsequently questioned, disputed, or opposed by another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7ce28081908b08d65ee6e5c8be |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60c3b09488190ade1b69ff7f0df0e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b8461ac81908c5bd3d73eed59f4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:42 p.m.