Triple
T25631864
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | hermeneutic circle |
E642596
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theory of interpretation |
C39297
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: theory of interpretation Context triple: [hermeneutic circle, instanceOf, theory of interpretation]
-
A.
philosophical interpretation
A philosophical interpretation is a conceptual framework that explains, clarifies, or recontextualizes ideas, texts, or phenomena in terms of underlying philosophical assumptions, theories, and arguments.
-
B.
theory of reference
A theory of reference is a philosophical account that explains how words, names, or expressions connect to and stand for objects, properties, or entities in the world.
-
C.
theory of sense and reference
The theory of sense and reference is a philosophical framework, originating with Frege, that distinguishes between the meaning or mode of presentation of an expression (sense) and the actual object or truth-value it stands for (reference) to explain how language conveys information and supports rational thought.
-
D.
philosophical theory of signs
chosen
A philosophical theory of signs is a conceptual framework that explains how signs (such as words, images, and symbols) represent, convey, and generate meaning in human thought, language, and communication.
-
E.
theory of argument
A theory of argument is a conceptual framework that analyzes how reasons support claims, specifying the structures, principles, and standards that distinguish sound, persuasive arguments from weak or fallacious ones.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7bd4548190a0c691b8a2f27ff1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:18 p.m.