Triple
T25629337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peñoles Mixtec |
E642529
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mixtec language variety |
C50564
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Mixtec language variety Context triple: [Peñoles Mixtec, instanceOf, Mixtec language variety]
-
A.
Mazatec language variety
A Mazatec language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Mazatec language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Mazatecan linguistic continuum.
-
B.
Matlatzinca language variety
A Matlatzinca language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Matlatzinca language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Matlatzinca linguistic continuum.
-
C.
Mazahua language variety
A Mazahua language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Mazahua language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Mazahua linguistic continuum.
-
D.
Amuzgo language variety
An Amuzgo language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Amuzgo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Amuzgo linguistic continuum.
-
E.
Kaqchikel language variety
The Kaqchikel language variety is a Mayan language spoken primarily in the central highlands of Guatemala, characterized by its agglutinative morphology, ergative-absolutive alignment, and rich system of aspect and status markers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7bd4548190a0c691b8a2f27ff1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:16 p.m.