Triple

T25625959
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heads of the Proposals E642429 entity
Predicate proposedLimitationOn P64413 FINISHED
Object royal authority LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: royal authority | Statement: [Heads of the Proposals, proposedLimitationOn, royal authority]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedLimitationOn
Context triple: [Heads of the Proposals, proposedLimitationOn, royal authority]
  • A. hasLimitation
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
  • B. showsLimitationOf
    Indicates that one entity reveals, demonstrates, or makes apparent the limitations, weaknesses, or constraints of another entity.
  • C. definesLimitOf
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the maximum or boundary condition applicable to another entity.
  • D. limitaCon chosen
    Indicates that one entity imposes a restriction, constraint, or limit on another entity or its behavior.
  • E. isLimitOf
    Indicates that one quantity, function, or sequence approaches a particular value as its input or index approaches some specified point or condition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e77e7bd4548190a0c691b8a2f27ff1 completed April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60c3b09488190ade1b69ff7f0df0e completed May 2, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f60b8461ac81908c5bd3d73eed59f4 completed May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:14 p.m.