Triple
T25622031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bostock v. Clayton County |
E642323
|
entity |
| Predicate | consolidatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. | Statement: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedCase, Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consolidatedCase Context triple: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedCase, Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.]
-
A.
consolidatedAs
Indicates that one entity has been combined, merged, or unified into another entity to form a single consolidated whole.
-
B.
consolidatedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that legal authority or control over multiple areas or cases has been combined and is exercised under a single jurisdiction.
-
C.
relatedCase
chosen
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
D.
consolidatedBy
Indicates that one entity has been merged, unified, or combined into a more cohesive whole by another entity.
-
E.
consolidatedUnder
Indicates that one entity has been merged into and is now formally part of another, typically larger or parent, entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fa2121f4819082c5135147a0f0d9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4807f8680819098a524158d049c63 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:05 p.m.