Triple
T25619128
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre |
E642242
|
entity |
| Predicate | designCollaboration |
P166126
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public–private partnership |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public–private partnership | Statement: [Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, designCollaboration, public–private partnership]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designCollaboration Context triple: [Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, designCollaboration, public–private partnership]
-
A.
helpsDesign
Indicates that one entity assists or contributes to another entity’s design or design process.
-
B.
designLead
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary designer or person in charge of leading the design work for another entity or project.
-
C.
designOutcome
Indicates the result, effect, or consequence produced by a particular design or design process.
-
D.
designCheck
Indicates that an entity performs a review or verification of a design to ensure it meets specified requirements or standards.
-
E.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66003a3f48190a2ba6da5aafbb5cb |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65c1f94ac8190bc6fbc7916fc0d82 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f65f75ac608190a62cd6afce14f68e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:02 p.m.