Triple
T25616997
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Socket A |
E642184
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleChipsetsVendor |
P159756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | VIA |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: VIA | Statement: [Socket A, compatibleChipsetsVendor, VIA]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleChipsetsVendor Context triple: [Socket A, compatibleChipsetsVendor, VIA]
-
A.
usedWithChipsetsFrom
chosen
Indicates that something is designed or suitable to be used together with specific chipsets from a given manufacturer or family.
-
B.
supportsHardwareVendor
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement to a hardware vendor in fulfilling its products or services.
-
C.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
D.
compatibleBrand
Indicates that one brand is suitable for use with, or functions properly alongside, another brand.
-
E.
supportsOnChipNetworking
Indicates that one entity provides or enables integrated networking capabilities directly on a chip for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61f12b0f08190bc4a16907941864c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b37a5648190b10d33ae205ccfee |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5 p.m.