Triple
T25615436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joachim Carvallo |
E642142
|
entity |
| Predicate | partnerInRestoration |
P160871
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ann Coleman |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ann Coleman | Statement: [Joachim Carvallo, partnerInRestoration, Ann Coleman]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partnerInRestoration Context triple: [Joachim Carvallo, partnerInRestoration, Ann Coleman]
-
A.
partnerInMission
Indicates that two or more entities collaborate as partners in carrying out the same mission or operation.
-
B.
partnerInDiscovery
Indicates that two or more entities collaborated as partners in making a particular discovery.
-
C.
partnerInWorkOf
Indicates a collaborative relationship where one entity works together with another on a shared task, project, or professional activity.
-
D.
partnerInReformWith
Indicates that two entities collaborate as partners in carrying out or supporting a reform effort.
-
E.
partnerInLeadershipWith
Indicates that two entities share a joint leadership role or responsibility, collaborating as partners in guiding or managing an organization, group, or initiative.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60ac643108190ae81561267155791 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f606c15af88190958856a9e467b826 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 4:59 p.m.