Triple
T25614541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Patent Act of 1952 |
E642122
|
entity |
| Predicate | codifiedDoctrine |
P159469
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contributory infringement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contributory infringement | Statement: [Patent Act of 1952, codifiedDoctrine, contributory infringement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: codifiedDoctrine Context triple: [Patent Act of 1952, codifiedDoctrine, contributory infringement]
-
A.
codifiedDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that a set of beliefs, principles, or rules has been formally systematized and recorded as an official doctrine.
-
B.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
C.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
D.
citedForDoctrine
Indicates that one entity is cited as an authoritative source or precedent for a particular doctrine, principle, or rule in relation to another entity.
-
E.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5f9e57720819080092db441fd60ef |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5afec3e94819080d9ba86cf8c866e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 4:58 p.m.