Triple

T25602076
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AL (Attributive Language) E641812 entity
Predicate hasRoleSyntax P165823 FINISHED
Object binary relations between individuals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binary relations between individuals | Statement: [AL (Attributive Language), hasRoleSyntax, binary relations between individuals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRoleSyntax
Context triple: [AL (Attributive Language), hasRoleSyntax, binary relations between individuals]
  • A. hasRole
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. includesRoles
    Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses one or more specified roles within its scope or structure.
  • C. hasLegalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific legal capacity, status, or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. requiresRole
    Indicates that performing an action or accessing a resource is contingent on the subject having a specified role or set of roles.
  • E. hasSafetyRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a responsibility or function related to safety within a given context or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75dc60d108190b7e2419e36b0134b completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65b14512c8190a40e70319dcc54cd completed May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659cc571c819097e51e531961d812 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65a9cb0bc8190bf8a9b319900bad5 completed May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 4:31 p.m.