Triple
T25597754
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Murder of James Byrd Jr. |
E641698
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentExecutionOfPerpetrator |
P160132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John William King executed in Texas in 2019 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John William King executed in Texas in 2019 | Statement: [Murder of James Byrd Jr., subsequentExecutionOfPerpetrator, John William King executed in Texas in 2019]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentExecutionOfPerpetrator Context triple: [Murder of James Byrd Jr., subsequentExecutionOfPerpetrator, John William King executed in Texas in 2019]
-
A.
subsequentExecutionOfPerpetrator
chosen
Indicates that one execution event occurs after another execution event carried out by the same perpetrator.
-
B.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
-
C.
perpetratorTrial
Indicates that a legal trial is conducted to judge the actions or guilt of the identified perpetrator.
-
D.
executionMethodForPerpetrator
Indicates the method or means by which a perpetrator carried out an execution.
-
E.
subsequentCase
Indicates that one legal case follows another in time or procedural order, often relying on or referencing the earlier case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75dc60d108190b7e2419e36b0134b |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f606c79ad081908369605f72e65ca6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 4:29 p.m.