Triple
T2555081
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Microsoft Loop |
E56712
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsCollaborationType |
P24486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | asynchronous collaboration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: asynchronous collaboration | Statement: [Microsoft Loop, supportsCollaborationType, asynchronous collaboration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsCollaborationType Context triple: [Microsoft Loop, supportsCollaborationType, asynchronous collaboration]
-
A.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
-
B.
supportsType
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or being compatible with a specified type.
-
C.
supportsParticipantType
Indicates that an entity is compatible with, or designed to work with, a specified type or category of participant.
-
D.
cooperationType
Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
-
E.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4bfec081908039988ec4c86e28 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd5a33234819082ad49fa6594b6be |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0c8b6f08190a68645db3e8b779a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:48 p.m.