Triple
T25533225
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Young Ottomans |
E639977
|
entity |
| Predicate | opposedReformProgram |
P115953
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tanzimat centralizing policies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tanzimat centralizing policies | Statement: [Young Ottomans, opposedReformProgram, Tanzimat centralizing policies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposedReformProgram Context triple: [Young Ottomans, opposedReformProgram, Tanzimat centralizing policies]
-
A.
opposedProject
Indicates that an entity actively resisted, disagreed with, or worked against a particular project.
-
B.
advocatedReformOf
Indicates that one entity publicly supported or promoted changes to another entity, typically aiming to improve or modify its structure, policies, or practices.
-
C.
opposedAdministration
chosen
Indicates that one entity actively resisted, challenged, or worked against the governance, policies, or authority exercised by another entity or administration.
-
D.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
E.
attitudeTowardReform
Indicates an entity’s stance, opinion, or disposition regarding a proposed or ongoing reform.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75dbf3f9c8190b3f2a75d1b75d127 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6352fdb788190b9bad30243690743 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63182f1408190bddc1214fcbd6145 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 3:15 p.m.