Triple
T25523619
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dinosaurs |
E639720
|
entity |
| Predicate | endings |
P60823
|
FINISHED |
| Object | series finale depicting dinosaur extinction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: series finale depicting dinosaur extinction | Statement: [Dinosaurs, endings, series finale depicting dinosaur extinction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endings Context triple: [Dinosaurs, endings, series finale depicting dinosaur extinction]
-
A.
alternateEnding
Indicates that one version of a work provides a different conclusion or final sequence of events compared to the original or primary ending.
-
B.
notableEnding
chosen
Indicates that an entity concludes or finishes in a way that is remarkable, memorable, or otherwise noteworthy.
-
C.
endedWith
Indicates that one event, process, or state concluded with or was finalized by another specified event, condition, or outcome.
-
D.
endOf
Indicates that one entity marks the terminating point or final boundary of another entity, event, or interval.
-
E.
closingVerse
Indicates that one entity serves as the final or concluding verse of another entity, such as a song, poem, or hymn.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75dbf3f9c8190b3f2a75d1b75d127 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5f8380f488190ba346ab3ea72468c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f468421ba08190880eac99135e5970 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 3:08 p.m.