Triple

T25508812
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sonnet 1 "Loving in truth" E639315 entity
Predicate conclusionIdea P533 FINISHED
Object true invention comes from looking in one’s own heart LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true invention comes from looking in one’s own heart | Statement: [Sonnet 1 "Loving in truth", conclusionIdea, true invention comes from looking in one’s own heart]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionIdea
Context triple: [Sonnet 1 "Loving in truth", conclusionIdea, true invention comes from looking in one’s own heart]
  • A. closingIdea
    Indicates the concluding or summarizing idea that wraps up a discussion, argument, or presentation.
  • B. conclusionType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conclusion associated with an argument, inference, or reasoning process.
  • C. concludesAbout
    Indicates that one entity forms or states a conclusion regarding another entity or its properties.
  • D. concludes
    Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
  • E. coreIdea chosen
    Indicates the central concept or primary message that underlies or unifies something, such as a text, argument, or work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75dbd09308190b6b5f0afdc12ec6d completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f5f80844488190bbbaa6bd2e487940 completed May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f49377411c8190b2188de444d76795 completed May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:48 p.m.