Triple

T25507767
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Britomart E639290 entity
Predicate roleInAllegory P77707 FINISHED
Object ideal chaste woman LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ideal chaste woman | Statement: [Britomart, roleInAllegory, ideal chaste woman]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInAllegory
Context triple: [Britomart, roleInAllegory, ideal chaste woman]
  • A. allegoricalInterpretation chosen
    Indicates that one entity is interpreted as symbolically representing deeper, often moral or spiritual, meanings within another entity (such as a text, image, or event).
  • B. allegoricalRoleInInferno
    Indicates a symbolic or allegorical function that an entity fulfills within the narrative framework of Dante’s Inferno.
  • C. allegoryType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a specific kind or category of allegory in relation to another entity.
  • D. allegoricalDomain
    Indicates that one entity serves as the abstract or symbolic domain that another entity allegorically represents or refers to.
  • E. roleInTheology
    Indicates the specific function, position, or significance an entity holds within a theological system, doctrine, or belief framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75dbd09308190b6b5f0afdc12ec6d completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6bbf6e33c819086e5176d64e7a614 completed May 3, 2026, 3:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6ba6b1e6c8190adf9d6a257e0b744 completed May 3, 2026, 3 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:47 p.m.