Triple

T25499845
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject short integer solution problem E639078 entity
Predicate securityBasisFor P159765 FINISHED
Object Fiat–Shamir with aborts signatures LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fiat–Shamir with aborts signatures | Statement: [short integer solution problem, securityBasisFor, Fiat–Shamir with aborts signatures]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityBasisFor
Context triple: [short integer solution problem, securityBasisFor, Fiat–Shamir with aborts signatures]
  • A. securityGuarantee
    Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
  • B. securedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
  • C. securityArrangementsBy
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
  • D. securityPillar
    Indicates that one entity functions as a foundational security pillar or core security domain in relation to another entity.
  • E. securityType
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75dbbd2a88190b70e1e645de14b9a completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f5f7ad6bf881909d335be043a00242 completed May 2, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5afd5baac8190bb8ed576813c8591 completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a completed May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:42 p.m.