Triple

T2548486
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ministerial Code of the United Kingdom E57961 entity
Predicate sanction P39509 FINISHED
Object resignation of a minister LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resignation of a minister | Statement: [Ministerial Code of the United Kingdom, sanction, resignation of a minister]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sanction
Context triple: [Ministerial Code of the United Kingdom, sanction, resignation of a minister]
  • A. typeOfSanction
    Indicates the specific category or kind of sanction that is applied in a given situation.
  • B. enforcement
    Indicates the act of compelling compliance with rules, laws, or agreements through monitoring, pressure, or sanctions.
  • C. canImposeSanctions
    Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to apply punitive or restrictive measures (sanctions) against another entity.
  • D. receivedSanctionFrom
    Indicates that one entity has been subjected to a formal penalty, restriction, or disciplinary measure imposed by another entity.
  • E. sacrifice
    Indicates giving up something of value, often for the benefit, protection, or advantage of another entity or goal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a5212d88190b989ce129f2ad87f completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd2e7cd4c8190a52cbbf1229441a6 completed March 7, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0c63964819092d5f578195ae8dd completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd1c7b6e48190be9a0c31069df797 completed March 7, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m.