Triple
T25483797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of London (1871) |
E638644
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrincipleAffirmed |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pacta sunt servanda in multilateral treaties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pacta sunt servanda in multilateral treaties | Statement: [Treaty of London (1871), legalPrincipleAffirmed, pacta sunt servanda in multilateral treaties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrincipleAffirmed Context triple: [Treaty of London (1871), legalPrincipleAffirmed, pacta sunt servanda in multilateral treaties]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
C.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
D.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
E.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75dbabeac8190bab30628f8b799d4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66c5c13808190887180099745673b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66abddc448190a488852f8abdeb2c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:31 p.m.