Triple
T25478088
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conseil des Cinq-Cents |
E638488
|
entity |
| Predicate | votingEligibilityForMembers |
P59316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | elected by electoral colleges |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elected by electoral colleges | Statement: [Conseil des Cinq-Cents, votingEligibilityForMembers, elected by electoral colleges]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: votingEligibilityForMembers Context triple: [Conseil des Cinq-Cents, votingEligibilityForMembers, elected by electoral colleges]
-
A.
hasVotingRightInSenate
Indicates that an entity possesses the legal right to participate in voting within a senate body.
-
B.
hasElectoralRight
Indicates that an entity possesses the legal right to participate in elections, typically by voting or standing as a candidate.
-
C.
eligibleVoters
Indicates that the referenced entities are legally permitted and qualified to vote in a given election or jurisdiction.
-
D.
voterEligibilityCriterion
chosen
Indicates the rule or condition that determines whether an individual is allowed to vote in a given context.
-
E.
eligibleForElectionBy
Indicates that one party meets the necessary conditions to be chosen or voted into a position or office by another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75db9b964819096802dcf502e577e |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5f7737a1c81909933c73eacdfd6a8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f480789be08190ab252a6de3797200 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:26 p.m.